
š "The War of the Rohirrim" Spoiler-Free Review: A Serviceable, Not Stupendous, Return to Rohan
While parts are enjoyable, their sum fails to reach the franchiseās previous cinematic heights
Hello all!
Today I have some thoughts on Warner Bros. new animated Lord of the Rings movie, The War of the Rohirrim, which I saw Sunday night.
This review is spoiler-free so that you can get a sense of my thoughts without any major spoilers if youāre planning to see it soon.
The War of the Rohirrim Spoiler-Free Review
I enjoyed many of the elements of The War of the Rohirrim, which adapts approximately three pages of material on the story of Helm Hammerhand from Appendix A of The Lord of the Rings into a 2 hour and 14 minute film.
I liked the main cast of characters, from Helm Hammerhand to HĆ©ra and her brothers (HĆ”ma and Haleth). HĆ©raās guardian Olwyn (who I particularly enjoyed), Lief the new herald, and HĆ©raās cousin FrĆ©alĆ”f were also all well-rounded and likeable characters. Additionally, Wulf was a credibly threatening villain driven by a tireless vengeance that at times bordered on unbelievable but never jumped the shark into ridiculous or implausible.
I thought it was an inspired choice to make this an animated film: animation is such a natural fit for fantasy stories and I hope this is the first of a new wave of many animated The Lord of the Rings and other related or inspired fantasy films.
And I loved experiencing Middle-earth in the cinema again,1 especially in December. Thereās something that just feels especially right about The Lord of the Rings at Christmastime.
But something about the movie just didnāt āclickā for me. Though the soundtrack samples Howard Shoreās masterpiece of a score in several places (notably during the Overture), the original music was by and large underwhelming, even approaching distracting in several scenes. Most Easter Eggs, including two involving cameos or mentions of some familiar magical faces/names, failed to stir anything approaching excitement in me. Several crowd scenes that were supposed to depict fearsome or inspiring forces were underwhelming: the total number of figures in these scenes were sparse compared to my expectations, which left me wondering if there would be more appearing or if that was it.
The Heart of the Matter
In talking about the movie with my wife immediately after I got back from the showing, she asked what I felt was missing. And the answer, I think, is heart. The āemotional coreā of the movie is not its strongest point. Yes, HĆ©ra is a likeable protagonist. (And Iām happy to report that any and all fears that turning this character Tolkien leaves unnamed into the protagonist of the film is an āagenda-driven mistakeā that is somehow ādisrespecting Tolkienā are completely unfounded.) But though she is fighting to preserve her family and her nationā¦I was left a bit on the outside of that fight emotionally.
Perhaps I will warm to it upon future viewings. And maybe thatās more of an individual issue for me than an issue with the film itself. But one of the reasons for the success of The Lord of the Rings both in print and on-screen is that we experience the story through the vantage point of the Hobbits. Their love for āpeace and quiet, and good tilled earthā¦[and] things that growā is relatable, as are their reactions to being thrust into the middle of events entirely beyond their experience and ability to comprehend or (seemingly) affect. It is in their experience of Middle-earth that we are drawn into and become invested in the story. Itās why we care about Middle-earth: because the Shire is worth saving.
The War of the Rohirrim did not produce the same level of investment in me. The story of Helm as written in Appendix A reads (appropriately) like a history tome. So it falls to the filmmakers to flesh out the events and give us a reason to be invested in what is occurring onscreen. But the results were not entirely successful. I wonāt go so far as to call it soulless (as Iāve seen in some reviews). But I didnāt leave the theater excited or thrilled.
To be clear, I enjoyed the film. It didnāt leave me disappointed, exactly. But I also have little desire to see it again immediately or even in the near future. If anything, it makes me want to throw on The Two Towers and/or The Return of the King instead.2 Which perhaps is not the worst thing in the world to be left with as a takeaway.
So while I enjoyed aspects of it, The War of the Rohirrim never came together for me, seeming content to echo some of the best of Peter Jacksonās trilogy without the heart and inspiration that make those films sing.
So, should you see it?
If youāre a Lord of the Rings fan (and letās face it, the fact that youāre reading this indicates you almost certainly are) then I think youāll find the movie a fine way to spend an afternoon or evening. By all means go see it in the theater! Thereās definitely a good bit to like about the film. But donāt go in expecting the same heights as the films it draws so deeply from or you may leave disappointed.
And donāt feel like youāre necessarily missing out if you choose to wait for it to come to streaming. After all, you can marathon the movies it is attempting to channel in the meantime.
For Discussion
Already seen the movie? What did you think?
Want to discuss spoilers (using spoiler-tags) or hear more of my in-depth thoughts? Join the conversation on the Jokien with Tolkien Discord!
š Tolkien Gift Guide ā 2024
Just a few days left to order gifts that will arrive in time for Christmas! If you haven't yet or meant to come back to it, check out my gift guide here
Appendices
Per Deadline, The War of the Rohirrim only made $4.6 million its opening weekend. Its budget was just $30 million, but thatās still a disappointing number for the film. Variety claims the film āwas developed and fast-tracked to ensure that New Line Cinema didnāt lose the film adaptation rights for Tolkienās novels while Jackson and the teams behind the āLord of the Ringsā and āHobbitā trilogies were working on two new live-action films for 2026 and beyond,ā so financial success wasnāt necessarily the main goal of the film. Whatever the reason, if you go itās likely that you (like I was) will be one of a handful of people in your particular showing.
Thanks to Extended Edition members for supporting this newsletter and making it possible for me to go see the film and share my thoughts with everyone! If you regularly get value, entertainment, encouragement, or inspiration from this newsletter, consider upgrading your subscription and supporting this newsletter for just $5 a month (or less at the annual rate)!
š You can read more of my writing by reading my books! My latest is a collection of essays on The Lord of the Rings, The Silmarillion, and more of Tolkienās works (and their adaptations). You can find it and more of my books on Amazon or Gumroad
āļø If someone forwarded this email to you or you found it through social media or Google, Iād like to invite you to join 11,000+ subscribers in the Jokien with Tolkien community: Subscribe here and get a free gift just for joining!
š¹ Chosen as a Substack Featured Publication in 2023
šŖ Official merch available in the Jokien with Tolkien store
ā All typos are precisely as intended
š Links may be affiliate, which is a free-to-you way to support this newsletter where I earn a small commission on items you purchase
šļø Canāt wait till next week for more content? View the archive
šÆ Interested in writing a guest piece like the above? Check out my submission guidelines. Want to sponsor an issue? Email me at JRRJokien@JRRJokien.com
I was not lucky enough to catch any of the episodes of Rings of Power when they were in theaters for special events
Who am I kidding, gotta watch all three haha
The difference between Tolkien and the writers who come after him can be stated as the difference between āI am no manā and āI need no manā⦠I disagree with you that it was not agenda-driven - even allowing for the fact that portions of the plot are similar to what Tolkien wrote in the Appendix, Wulfās motivations toward the end seem to be more about getting revenge upon āherā and proving himself better than HĆ©ra (which he predictably fails at). Heās acting like an incel whoās been rejected by the Strong Feminist heroine. Thus HĆ©raās defeat of Wulf seems like the perfect feminist comeback to patriarchy and toxic incel culture. Thanks, but Tolkien already managed to make strong female characters who still loved males and got married, so thereās no need to try and convince me that these two things are mutually exclusive.
Also, HĆ©raās motivations remain exactly the same from start to finish, and she is exceptionally good at everything from swordfighting to mountaineering. Mary Sue, anyone?
P.S. Did they have to rip off Ćowyn and make the feminist rejection so on the nose with that scene? You know the one Iām talking about.
I enjoyed it and will watch it again! I went into it already invested in Rohan where it sounds like you didn't (or at least not as much), and I wasn't expecting it to be a big-budget epic.